The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed a Criminal Application seeking condonation of delay in filing a Criminal Appeal. The Bench held that delay deserves condonation in the interest of justice and permitted the appeal to proceed.
Condonation of delay in filing Criminal Appeal Stamp No. 350 of 2017 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 585 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL STAMP NO. 350 OF 2017 Narayan Yajindar Bhosale .. Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
None for the Applicant. Mrs.G.P. Mulekar, APP for State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. 28th APRIL, 2017
P.C. :
of delay caused in filing Criminal Appeal Stamp No. 350 of 2017
against the conviction and sentence under section 302 of IPC.
and in the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned. Application is allowed in the above terms.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing Criminal Appeal Stamp No. 350 of 2017 against conviction under Section 302 IPC deserves condonation.
Whether the application for condonation of delay should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayan Yajindar Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
M.S.Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
