Criminal applicant prayed to be considered since the main appeal was decided. The High Court held that nothing survives in the application following the disposal of the main appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12b. cri appa 559-15.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 559 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 862 OF 2014
Bhagwan Sakharam Bhangare
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Mrs. Farhana Shah | Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant |
| Mr. Arfan Sait | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 6, 2017.
P.C.:
this application. The same is disposed of accordingly.
[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 1
Bhagwan Sakharam Bhangare
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
