In this criminal application, the Bombay High Court condoned the delay in filing a criminal appeal against conviction and sentence under Section 302 of the IPC, finding that the delay should be condoned in the interest of justice.
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal; application allowed in terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3a. cri appa 398-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 398 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 234 OF 2017
Dada @ Pravin Satish Pawar .. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Mr. D.G. Khamkar Advocate for the Applicant Mrs. G.P. Mulekar APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 29, 2017.
P.C.:
2. This is an application for condonation of delay caused in
filing the appeal against conviction and sentence mainly
under Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC.
3. In view of the averments made in the application and in
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
3a. cri appa 398-17.doc
the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that the delay
ought to be condoned, hence, the delay is condoned.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal appeal against conviction and sentence under Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC ought to be condoned.
Dada @ Pravin Satish Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
