A single-paragraph order condoning the delay in filing a criminal appeal under Section 302 IPC. The High Court allowed the condonation application citing interest of justice.
Condonation of delay in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12a. cri appa 375-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 375 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 217 OF 2017
Haseena @ Sultana Fakir Kazi
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Mr. Prosper D'Souza Advocate for the Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 18, 2017.
P.C.:
2. This is an application for condonation of delay caused in
filing the appeal against conviction and sentence mainly
under Section 302 r/w 34 of IPC.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
12a. cri appa 375-17.doc
the interest of justice, we are of the opinion that the delay
ought to be condoned, hence, the delay is condoned.
[ M.S. KARNIK, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the criminal appeal against conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Haseena @ Sultana Fakir Kazi
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
