Application by accused for booklet and paper-book in Sessions Court rejected as he can access documents through his advocate.
Application for providing booklet and paper-book in Sessions Court rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-APPA-3-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.507 OF 2013
SAMUNDERSINGH MAHIPAL SINGH )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
None for the Applicant.
Mr.P.H.Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 6th MARCH 2017.
P.C. :
1 This is an application by appellant no.1 / accused for providing him booklet and paper-book in the Sessions court.
2 The learned advocate appearing for the appellant
no.1 / accused is absent. Appellant no.1 / accused can get necessary papers from his learned advocate. It is seen from the
avk 1/2
24-APPA-3-2017.doc
record that it was appellant no.1 / accused who has annexed all necessary documents along with his Memo of Appeal and as such, he can avail those documents from his learned advocate.
3 In this view of the matter, the application is rejected.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
SAMUNDERSINGH MAHIPAL SINGH
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
