This criminal application sought condonation of a 124-day delay in filing an appeal against conviction and sentence. The court held that sufficient cause existed for condoning the delay and allowed the application.
Condonation of 124-day delay in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6a. cri appa 16017.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 160 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 89 OF 2017
Yuvaraj Ananda Chavan & Anr.
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances Ms. Saima Ansari Advocate for the Applicants Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2017.
P.C.:
days in filing the appeal against the conviction and sentence.
In view of the averments made in the application, we are of
the opinion that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay, hence, the delay is condoned.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
6a. cri appa 16017.doc
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out for condonation of a 124-day delay in filing a criminal appeal.
Whether the delay in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence should be condoned.
Yuvaraj Ananda Chavan & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
