High Court of Bombay condoned delay in filing a second appeal in a criminal appeal (ST). Applicant's application disposed of; reasons stated for condoning delay.
Condoned delay in filing appeal; disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-APPA-1549-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1549 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.840 OF 2016
Dilip Pralhad Pahade
)...APPLLICANT.
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & Anr. )...RESPONDENTs
Mr. Dipak V. Churi, Advocate for the Applicant.
MR. Avinash Kamkhedkar APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 5th JANUARY 2017.
P.C. :
Heard both sides. Perused the application. For the stated reasons, delay in filing appeal is condoned. Application is disposed of accordingly.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
Shivgan 1/1
Dilip Pralhad Pahade
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
