This order allows a criminal application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal but dismisses the appeal itself without any detailed reasoning or substantive legal proposition.
The application for condonation of delay is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 8 cri appa 1415.16 in apeal as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1415 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.774 OF 2016 with CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.774 OF 2016
Manohar @ Manu Savji Sutar … Applicant/Appellant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Ms. P.S. Nile h/f Mr. Pankaj D. Kavale for the Applicant/Appellant. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State.
Coram : A.A. Sayed &
Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ. Date : 23 August 2017
P.C. :
the Criminal Appeal.
2 For the reasons stated in the Criminal Application, the same is allowed. The Application is disposed of accordingly.
3 List the Criminal Appeal before the appropriate Court after numbering.
(Sarang V. Kotwal, J.) (A.A. Sayed, J.)
katkam
Manohar @ Manu Savji Sutar
The State of Maharashtra
A.A. Sayed
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
