The High Court of Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction allowed an application for condonation of delay of 22 days in filing an appeal against conviction and sentence without detailed reasoning.
The application for condonation of delay is allowed; the delay of 22 days is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 6.cr.appa.1197.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1197 OF 2017 IN
CRI. APPEAL ST. NO. 722 OF 2017
Popat Shripati Gaikwad .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Ms. Rohini Dandekar Adv. appointed for the Applicant Mr. Arfan Sait A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2017
P.C.:
2 This is an application for condonation of delay caused
in filing the appeal against the conviction and sentence. The delay is of only 22 days. In view of the averments made in the application, we are inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. Application is allowed in above terms.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI,J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]
kandarkar
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 22 days in filing the appeal against conviction and sentence should be condoned.
Popat Shripati Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
