Application for temporary bail to undergo medical treatment and be with a sick wife was rejected. The Court held no active cardiology management was required and suggested psychiatric opinion only.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/2 cri APPA 1148.17 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1148 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.459 OF 2012
Jakir Ahmed Shakir Ahmed Khan … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Ateek Shirodkar i/b Mr.Ganesh Gole for the Applicant. Mr. Dinesh Kadam i/b Mr.A. Majeed Memon for the Complainant. Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM: A.A. SAYED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE: 29 AUGUST, 2017
P.C.
bail for three months to undergo medical treatment and also on the ground that the Applicant is required to be with his wife on account of her health condition.
“No active cardiology management is required at present. To continue psychiatric medicine. Psychiatric opinion to rule out anxiety neurosis.”
4 Thus, the Medical Report suggests that necessary tests were carried out and the Applicant is being treated by a Psychiatrist as suggested by the Cardiologist. Copy of Medical Report with case papers are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether temporary bail should be granted to a life convict for medical treatment of cardiologist and psychiatric consultation.
Jakir Ahmed Shakir Ahmed Khan
The State of Maharashtra
A.A. Sayed
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
