Vivek Vishnu Kapse v. Ankush Baban Kapse and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This Criminal Application challenges a stray inclusion in an order dated 14th December 2016 which incorrectly listed respondent Nos. 1 to 6 instead of 2, 3, and 5. The Court corrected the clerical error, clarifying that the order applies only to the intended respondents.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 14th December 2016 is corrected to apply to respondent Nos. 2, 3, and 5 instead of 1 to 6.
What the court decided
appa.1051.16.8.speaking.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1051 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 730 OF 2015
Vivek Vishnu Kapse ...Applicant Versus Ankush Baban Kapse & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Yashodeep Deshmukh I/b Mr. Subhash Hulyalkar for the Applicant
Mr. Subodh Desai a/w Mr. Hrishikesh Chavan for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6
Mr. H. J. Dedia, A.P.P for the Respondent No.7-State
CORAM : SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI &
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. MONDAY, 13th FEBRUARY, 2017
P.C. :
- The last sentence in paragraph 5 of the order dated
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the stray inclusion of respondent Nos. 1 and 6 in the impugned order requires correction since the application concerned only Respondents 2, 3, and 5.
Whether the correction of the names in the order dated 14th December 2016 is justifiable.
Whether any other relief or substantive direction is required from this Court.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vivek Vishnu Kapse
- respondent
Ankush Baban Kapse
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court