Ambadas Chandrakant Aaretla v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge bench rejected a jail application seeking early hearing of a criminal appeal, finding no merit for priority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-APPA-1027-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1027 OF 2017 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431 OF 2016
Ambadas Chandrakant Aaretla … Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mrs. Nasreen Sajid Khalique Ayubi, for the Applicant. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
SARANG V. KOTWAL,JJ.
DATED : 21 AUGUST 2017
P.C.:
circumstances, the Application is rejected.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)
Sameer 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether priority hearing may be granted in the pending criminal appeal.
Ambadas Chandrakant Aaretla
The State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court