Appeal declared infructuous because the underlying motion was already disposed of. Order contains no other operative details or substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPL 338-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO. 338 OF 2016 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2017 OF 2016 IN
SUIT NO. 78 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2518 OF 2016 AND
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2677 OF 2016
Ankit Vidhya Vasini Mishra V/s
Naqvi Sayed Mohammed Raza & Ors.
.. Appellant
.. Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Agrawal for the appellants. Mrs. Asha Nair i/b Diamondwala & Co. for the respondents.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ. & G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY 2017
P.C.:
The appeal is disposed of as infructuous since the main motion itself is disposed of.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
1 of 1
ABS
Ankit Vidhya Vasini Mishra
Naqvi Sayed Mohammed Raza
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
