Criminal applicant challenged the dismissal of his complaint by a Magistrate who sought police investigation under Section 202 CrPC for a civil dispute. The High Court held the Magistrate exercised proper discretion and dismissed the application.
The criminal application was rejected with costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hcs
1 36.apl712.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.712 OF 2016
Ganpat Shivkaran Khorwal .. Applicant. Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents.
Dr.Nilesh Pawaskar i/b Sangeeta Pawaskar for the Applicant. Mr.Vinod Chate APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J.
DATED : 12TH JULY, 2017
P.C. :
2 36.apl712.16
the inquiry himself. He therefore takes exception to the said order and states that it is error apparent on the face of the order and therefore seeks order issuing process.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere with the Magistrate's order directing police investigation under Section 202 CrPC in a dispute alleged to be of civil nature.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ganpat Shivkaran Khorwal
The State of Maharashtra
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
