The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition by the applicant after the matter was amicably worked out and a bond was obtained by the police.
The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-apl-617-2015.odt
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 617 OF 2015
Uday Vasudev Kini … Applicant vs. Tushar Vasant Langalia & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Ramesh Gupta i/b, Mr. V. M. Vaghela for the Applicant. Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for the State.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATE : 26 th JULY, 2017
P.C.:
1. Learned Counsel for the applicant states that the matter has been amicably
worked out since police have obtained bond from the respondent no. 1. In view of this development he seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
1/1
Uday Vasudev Kini
Tushar Vasant Langalia
A. K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
