This bench treated a criminal appeal as an application for leave to appeal based on Supreme Court exposition in Satya Pal Singh. Notice was issued and record called.
Notice issued; record called for proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cria664.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.664 OF 2016
Anita d/o Acchutrao Barkule
...APPELLANT
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra
and another.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Ms. Mayuri C. Kasturkar Advocate for
Appellant.
Mr.S.Y. Mahajan, Addl. P.P. for Resp. No.1.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2017
ORDER :
1. In view of exposition of law by the Supreme
Court in the case of Satya Pal Singh vs. State of
Madhya Pradesh and others, 2015 Cri.L.J. 4929, the
Appellant has incorporated the prayer of seeking
leave to appeal. The Registry to treat this
cria664.16
2
Appeal as Application in view of prayer of seeking
leave to Appeal and re-number the same.
2.Issue notice to the Respondents,
returnable on 7th March 2017. The learned A.P.P.
waives service of notice for Respondent No.1.
3.In the meanwhile, call for Record and
Proceedings.
asb/FEB17
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satya Pal Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and othersReferred¶14
Satya Pal Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others, 2015 Cri.L.J. 4929 · Who else cites this
Anita d/o Acchutrao Barkule
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court