This is orders where the High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal as abated, since the respondent proprietor has expired and proceedings do not survive.
Appeal dismissed as the proceedings abated due to the death of the respondent-proprietor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43-APEAL-373-99
Sarnobat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 373 OF 1999
Employees State Insurance Corporation. .. Appellant.
Vs.
Lakshmandas Narottamdas Shaha, & Anr. .. Respondents.
Mr. H.V. Mehta, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Satyajeet Shirke I/b Uday Warunjikar, for the Respondent No.1. Mr. S. R. Shinde, APP for the State.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATE : 11th OCTOBER, 2017.
P. C. :
1/2
43-APEAL-373-99
state that no further order in this regard is warranted as the appellant can always file appropriate proceedings, if permissible under the Law.
abated.
[ ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J ]
2/2
Employees State Insurance Corporation
Lakshmandas Narottamdas Shaha
Anr.
Anuja PrabhuDEssai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court