14.In the cross-examination Dr. Pande has stated
that except injury No.3 other injuries like injury Nos.
1,2,6 and 7 can be caused due to fall on hard and blunt
object. He denied that injury No.3 is possible only due
to sharp object. He stated that injury No.3 had bleeding
but could not tell as to whether there was excessive
bleeding. According to him in such cases the period of 12
hours after receiving of the injury is crucial. In the
cross-examination on behalf of accused No.2 he has denied
that unless some sharp weapon is used the injury No.3
cannot be caused. So also, he stated that if the person
is lying on the ground and bicycle is simply thrown on
the head and it is not hit on the head by using force
then there may not be injury like injury No.3. Thus, the
evidence of Dr. Pande regarding cause of death due to
cardio respiratory arrest due to cerebral laceration,
with intra cerebral hemorrhage with fracture of skull and
that in the ordinary course of nature injury No.3 is
sufficient to cause death has not been specifically
challenged in the course of his cross-examination on
behalf of the accused. It was not suggested to Dr. Pande,
that injury No.3 which was sufficient to cause death was
caused accidentally. The postmortem report (Exh.26) shows
that injuries as deposed by Dr. Pande were found on dead
body and it also shows cause of death as deposed by Dr.
