This application was disposed of as withdrawn upon acceptance of the respondent's statement that a demand draft of Rs.22,00,000/- was delivered to the applicant pursuant to consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(22)ALPNo.3012015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.301 OF 2015
Digambar Mahipati Wadekar ... Applicant V/s.
Gurnamsing Surendrasing Bhatiyani & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr.Manoj Shamrao Mohite, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.Abhijit P. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.Prashant Jadhav, APP for the Respondent No.2/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 11th DECEMBER 2017.
P.C. :
1 Mr.Abhijit Kulkarni appears for the respondent No.1/accused and submits that in view of the consent terms filed in the Court on 11/04/2016, the demand draft bearing No.007217 dated 30/04/2016 for an amount of Rs.22,00,000/- has been delivered to the applicant herein. The statement so made, on instructions, by the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1 is accepted.
2 In view of the statement made by the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent No.1/original accused, the learned
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(22)ALPNo.3012015
Advocate appearing for the applicant/original complainant seeks leave to withdraw the application.
3 The application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
2/2
Gaikwad RD
Digambar Mahipati Wadekar
Gurnamsing Surendrasing Bhatiyani & Anr.
A.M. Badar J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
