The High Court at Bombay granted leave to appeal in Criminal Application No. 222 of 2017. The Single Judge treated the application memo as a memo of appeal and admitted the appeal after hearing both sides.
Leave to appeal granted, appeal admitted, notice to respondents issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(7)ALPNo.2222017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATON NO.222 OF 2017 (For Leave to Appeal – Private)
Mrs.Vanita Amritlal Shah
V/s.
Mr.Bhavin Rameshchandra Kanuga & Anr.
... Respondents
Mr.Nitin Gangal I/b. Rajkumar Bhawsar, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.Bhavesh Thakur, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
Mr.V.V.Gangurde, APP for the Respondent No.2/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 14th DECEMBER 2017.
P.C. :
2 Perused the impugned Judgment and Order of acquittal, so also the material placed on record. Case for consideration is made out by the applicant/original complainant. Hence, leave granted.
3 The memo of the application be treated as memo of appeal.
1/2
Gaikwad RD
(7)ALPNo.2222017
code of Criminal Procedure before the trial Court.
2/2
Gaikwad RD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted in a private criminal appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Vanita Amritlal Shah
Mr. Bhavin Rameshchandra Kanuga
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
