The High Court of Bombay at Mumbai rejected a criminal application for leave to appeal due to want of prosecution, as neither party appeared on listing dates and the applicant was noted as uninterested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(24)ALPNo.1692017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2017 (For Leave to Appeal – Private)
Mr.Pramod Limbraj Gaikwad
... Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.
DATED : 20th DECEMBER 2017.
P.C. :
1 None had appeared when this application was listed for 13th December 2017. Today also, none appeared in the application.
2 It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the instant application.
3 Hence, the application is rejected for want of prosecution.
(A.M.BADAR J.)
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Pramod Limbraj Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
