Dilip Manglu Borse v. Deepika Sanjay Chavan and 9 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This election petition application stands adjourned to a future date at the request of the Election Commission's counsel. No substantive ruling is made.
This election petition application stands adjourned to a future date at the request of the Election Commission's counsel. No substantive ruling is made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ELECTION PETITION NO. 11 OF 2014
Dilip Manglu Borse ....Petitioner V/S
Deepika Sanjay Chavan And 13 Others ....Respondent
WITH
APPLN. IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 8 OF 2016
In
ELECTION PETITION 11 OF 2014
Dilip Manglu Borse ....Petitioner
V/S
Deepika Sanjay Chavan And 9 Others ....Respondent
WITH
APPLN. IN ELECTION PETITION LODGING NO. 8 OF 2017 In
ELECTION PETITION 11 OF 2014
Dilip Manglu Borse ....Petitioner V/S
Deepika Sanjay Chavan And 13 Ors And The ....Respondent Chief Electoral Officer For The State Of Maharashtra (appl)
Ms. Manjiri Sharad Parasnis, Advocate For Petitioner. Mr. M.S.Deshmukh a/w Gaurang Jhaveri i/by Mahendra N.Sandhyanshiv, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Ms.Drishti Shah i/by Pradeep Rajgopal, Advocate for Election Commission of India.
Page 1/2
CORAM : RAJESH G. KETKAR, J DATE : 16th March, 2018
P.C. :
At the request of the learned Advocate for the Respondent (Election Commission), Stand over to 06/04/2018 at 03.00 pm.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 2/2
Dilip Manglu Borse
Deepika Sanjay Chavan
RAJESH G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court