In this criminal application, the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur, considering the applicant's antecedents and the Investigating Agency's report, confirmed an existing order granting interim bail.
The interim protection granted by the order dated 22nd December, 2016 is confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 aba831.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRI. APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 831 OF 2016
(AKASH S/O PRAKASH TEMBHURNE...VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. P.S.O. PS SADAR, DISTT.NAGPUR)
None for the applicant. Shri A.M.Deshpande, A.P.P. for Non-applicant.
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J. DATED : JUNE 09, 2017.
Heard Shri. A. M. Deshpande, learned A. P. P. for the non-applicant.
The applicant apprehending arrest in crime registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 323 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code has sought pre-arrest bail.
According to the Investigating Agency, a group of 20-22 unknown persons entered the Cafe and claimed to belong to “Bhim Sena” and damaged Television set, 2 Refrigerators, 2 A. C., Plastic Chairs, Glass Table, Music System and Window Glasses, objecting the display of portrait of Lord Budha in the Cafe. According to the Investigating Agency, during the investigation and after examining CCTV footage, the presence of applicant is also found.
Applicant claims to be 23 years old and student of B.Com. Computer Application 1st Year. Applicant claims that
2 aba831.16
he is not involved in any other crime/offence. The applicant is granted interim protection by this Court by order passed on 22nd December, 2016. The Investigating Agency has not made any complaint that the applicant has misused the interim protection.
Considering the facts of the case, in my view, the interim protection granted by the order passed on 22nd December, 2016 is required to be confirmed. The interim order is confirmed and thus, application is allowed accordingly.
PB Patil .
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to confirm the interim bail protection granted earlier to the applicant?
AKASH S/O PRAKASH TEMBHURNE
Z.A.HAQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
