Allowed

Nitin Ankush Lokhande v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC3 May 2017ABA/731/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In anticipatory bail proceedings, the High Court allowed the application and granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant on conditional terms, noting that injuries to some complainants were simple while one was grievous, and no applicant was armed with weapons.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail granted on terms including a bond of Rs.20,000 with sureties, monthly reporting, non-tampering with evidence, and cooperating with the investigation agency.

Nitin Ankush Lokhande Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2017)

15-aba.731.2017.doc

1/4

nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.731 OF 2017

¶6

Nitin Ankush Lokhande ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶7

Mr.P.G.Sarda, i/b Mr.S.T.Zalte, for the Applicant

¶8

Mr.Prashant Jadhav, A.P.P for the Respondent-State

¶9

PSI – Rajkumar Prabhakar Kendre, Wakad Police Station, Pune.

¶10

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶11

DATE : 3^rd MAY, 2017

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P.

¶14

By this application, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in

¶15

connection with C.R. No. 151 of 2017 registered with the Wakad Police Station, Pune, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 326, 324,

¶16

323, 452, 143, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant

¶18

15-aba.731.2017.doc

¶19

2/4

¶20

has not been named in the FIR. He submits that the allegations are that coaccused Baburao Lokhande assaulted the Complainant – Mohan Kaname and that other unknown persons assaulted Shankar and Balaji (Complainant's brothers) with iron rods which were lying in the room; and that all the accused are alleged to have abused the Complainant and his brothers.

¶21

Perused the papers. Learned APP has produced the Injury Certificates of Mohan, Balaji and Shankar. Balaji and Shankar's Injury Certificates are of a private hospital. The Certificate shows that Shankar had received one injury on his left elbow joint and Balaji had received injuries on his left knee, right ankle and left palm. The injuries sustained by Balaji and Shankar appear to be simple injuries. As far as Mohan is concerned, he has sustained grievous injury. The same is stated to have been caused by Baburao Lokhande. Admittedly, the Applicant alongwith other accused were not armed with any weapons, when they had gone to the Complainant's house.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid, the Application is allowed and the

¶23

15-aba.731.2017.doc

¶24

3/4

¶25

applicant is granted pre-arrest bail on the following terms & conditions:-

¶26

ORDER

¶27

(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount ;

¶28

(ii) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station on the first Monday of every month between 10.00 a.m. to 11.00 a.m., for a period of 12 months from the date of filing of the charge-sheet;

¶29

(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case.

¶30

(iv) The Applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Agency.

¶31

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

¶32

15-aba.731.2017.doc

¶33

4/4

¶34

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima

¶35

facie and are confined to this application.

¶36

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

¶37

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)

Nitin Ankush Lokhande v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Ankush Lokhande v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bashir Dilawar Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Suyesh Suresh Gade Vs the State of Maharashtra

Girish Ambadas Motekar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sandeep @ Jalwa Shyamrao Bandgar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Sharma Vs the State of Maharashtra

Tushar Chandulal Patel Vs the State of Maharashtra