The High Court allowed anticipatory bail applications filed by three applicants accused of offences under the IPC relating to a land measurement dispute, holding that protection was needed in the matter.
Anticipatory bail applications allowed; interim relief previously granted is confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rng 1
sr.2.aba346.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.346 OF 2017
Lalit M.Lalwani .. Applicant vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
with ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.347 OF 2017
Prakash P.Jain .. Applicant vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
with ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.348 OF 2017
Achal Walchand Jain .. Applicant vs State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr.Sandeep D.Paigude Advocate a/w Ms.Reshma More for Applicants Mr.S.S.Hulke Additional Public Prosecutor for State-Respondent
CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, J DATE: 22 AUGUST 2017 P.C.
463, 464, 465,468,470, 471, etc of the IPC.
Rng 2 sr.2.aba346.17
Complainant.
sr.2.aba346.17
Rng 3
that protection needs to be given to the Applicant in the present matter.
already granted earlier is confirmed.
348 case of the Applicants are similar, they are allowed
accordingly.
(T.V.NALAWADE,)
Rng 4 sr.2.aba346.17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants involved in a property dispute regarding land measurement.
Lalit M. Lalwani
Prakash P. Jain
Achal Walchand Jain
State of Maharashtra
T.V.NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
