Partly allowed

Ashok Bhikaji Palwe v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC13 Feb 2017ABA/152/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court confirmed interim anticipatory bail granted to applicant accused in a sudden free fight case involving assault and grievous injuries, imposing specific conditions to ensure cooperation with investigation and preventing harassment of witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Interim pre-arrest bail confirmed with terms including attendance at police station, no tampering with evidence, no threat to complainant, no absconding, and furnishing of address.

Ashok Bhikaji Palwe Vs the State of Maharashtra — Cheating and Forgery | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

13.ABA152_2017.doc

¶2

Vidya Amin

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 152 OF 2017

¶5

Ashok Bhikaji Palwe Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra

¶7

... Applicant

¶8

... Respondent

¶9

Mr. Chetan S. Damre, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for Respondent/State. Mr. I.U. Shah, Police Havaldar, Lasalgaon Police Station present.

¶10

CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE: 13^th February, 2017.

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

This Application is moved by the applicant/accused under section 438 of Cr. P.C. The applicant/accused is prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 149, 307, 324 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code in C.R. No. I-139 of 2016 registered with Lasalgaon Police Station, Nashik.

¶13

The incident of assault took place on 3^rd November, 2016 at Lasalgaon. It is the case of the complainant Bajirao Jaywant Shinde that he was assaulted by Ashok Palwe and Nilesh Palwe. The complainant and his associates cried for help. His family members and other persons arrived there to help them and there was a free fight. Nearly 10 to 15 persons were assaulted. Thereafter the complainant approached the police and gave information, pursuant to which, the offence was registered by the police against the applicant/accused and co-accused.

¶14

1 / 3

¶15

13.ABA152_2017.doc

¶16

The learned counsel for the applicant/accused has submitted that it is a free and sudden fight. It was not pre-meditated attack and the applicant/accused has also registered separate C.R. No. 138 of 2016 at Lasalgaon police Station against the complainant and his family members. They were prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 337 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submitted that the applicant/accused is innocent and he does not have criminal record. The learned counsel submitted that the applicant/accused and his family members also were injured.

¶17

Learned APP opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application. He has submitted that the persons from both the sides have sustained grievous injuries and it was a free fight. He submitted that complainant Bajirao sustained grievous injury and 9 persons were injured from Shinde Family.

¶18

Perused the FIR, statements of the witnesses and the injury certificates. It appears that 9 persons were injured from Shinde Family and 17 persons were injured from Palwe family. There is no criminal antecedents against the applicant/accused. It was a sudden and free fight and cross complaint in C.R. No. 138 of 2016 was registered. Under such circumstances, considering the submissions and record, interim pre-arrest bail granted to the applicant/accused by order dated 30^th January, 2017 is hereby confirmed with same bail bond with following terms and conditions:

¶19

2 / 3

¶20

13.ABA152_2017.doc

¶21

i) The applicant/accused shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer and attend the concerned police station on every Tuesday between 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. till filing of the charge sheet;

¶22

ii) The applicant/accused shall not tamper with the evidence and shall not pressurize or threaten the complainant and his family members;

¶23

iii) The applicant/accused shall not indulge into any criminal activity especially against the complainant and his family members; iv) The applicant/accused shall not abscond or leave India without prior permission of the Court and furnish his permanent address to the Investigating Officer alongwith documentary proof.

¶24

Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of on above terms.

¶25

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

¶26

3 / 3

Ashok Bhikaji Palwe v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Bhikaji Palwe v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somnath Vilas Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Swapnali Sidhik Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra

Somnath Vilas Waghmare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kamala Thusang Lama Vs State of Maharashtra

Bajirao Jaywant Shinde and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Gautam and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra