Disposed

Ferromar Shipping Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Duly Const. Poa, Chandrakumar R. Huilgol., v. Prince Marine Transport Services Ltd.

Bombay HC17 Nov 2017AAR/12/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay at Goa appointed Mr. Devidas Pangam as an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 23 October 2015 between the applicant and respondent, following a notice issued in this arbitration application.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Devidas Pangam, Advocate, as an arbitrator to arbitrate upon the dispute.

Ferromar Shipping Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Duly Const. Poa, Chandrakumar… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

Santosh 1 aar12-17dt.17-11-17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶3

APPLN. FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR NO.12 OF 2017

¶4

`Ferromar Shipping Pt. Ltd.` `Versus`	`..…. Applicant.`
`Prince Marine` `Transport`
`Services Ltd.`	`....... Respondent.`

¶5

Ms. Melanie Jennifer Fernandes, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. Neha Kholkar, Advocate for the respondent.

¶6

Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.
 Date : 17 November 2017.

¶7

P.C.:

¶8

Heard Ms. M.J. Fernandes, learned Counsel for the

¶9

Applicant and Ms. Neha Kholkar, learned Counsel for the
Respondent.

¶10

2.The parties had entered into an agreement dated 23
October 2015 which contains an arbitration clause, as under :

¶11

“Any disputes arising by virtue of this contract or any difference of opinion between the parties hereto concerning their rights and obligations under the contract which can not be mutually settled shall be resolved by arbitration as per Indian Arbitration Act. This agreement is subject to the jurisdiction of High

¶12

Santosh 2 aar12-17dt.17-11-17

¶13

Court in Goa and for all legal purposes, this agreement
shall be deemed to be entered in Goa and subject to
Indian territorial jurisdiction.”

¶14

3.Notice was issued in this application. The learned
Counsel had appeared on the earlier date and sought time to take
instructions. The learned Counsel for the parties state that Mr.
Devidas Pangam, Advocate be appointed as an arbitrator.

¶15

4.Accordingly, Mr. Devidas Pangam, Advocate having his
Office at Panaji, Goa is appointed as an arbitrator to arbitrate upon
the dispute raised in the arbitration application arising out of the
agreement dated 23 October 2015. The application is disposed of.

¶16

 N.M. Jamdar, J.

Ferromar Shipping Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Duly Const. Poa, Chandrakumar R. Huilgol., v. Prince Marine Transport Services Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ferromar Shipping Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Duly Const. Poa, Chandrakumar R. Huilgol., v. Prince Marine Transport Services Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jose Faria @ Tamblo (Deceased) through His Legal Heirs and Anr., Vs Bruno Braganza Pereira and 2 Ors.

Nayantara Gangadhar Agrawal Rep. by Poa Devidas S. Kudchodkar Vs Albert B. Joanes (Since Dec.) through Lr'S

Savlo Shivram Mandrekar and Anr., Vs Kumudini Gurudas Joshi, Rep. Thr. Poa, Sanjay R. Joshi (Dec) Rep. by Her Legal Rep.

Yamini Sawant and 3 Ors., Vs Dr. Pandurang v. Kamat Ghanekar.

Archdiocese of Goa, Daman and Diu, Rep. Thr. Its Procurator., Vs Ravindra C.P. Navelkar.

Mr. Sergio Euclides D'Silva and Anr., Vs Mr. Atanasio Norberto Jose Joao Baptista Flavio Pinto E Silva (Dec) Thr. His Lrs and 2 Ors.