The court disposed of a writ petition regarding an application to initiate employee transfers during the academic year, ruling that such action was not considered viable.
Petition disposed; representation of 06.06.2016 not directed to be considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp983516.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9835 OF 2016
Zilla Parishad Madhyamik Shikshak Sangh, Zilla Shakha, Nanded
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.S.C.Bhosle, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.V.M.Kagane, AGP for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K.SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 26th September, 2016
PER COURT:
1 Normal period for effecting transfers of employees is already over and transfers are expected to be issued in the month of April or May. The representation made by petitioner-Union for initiating process of transfer of the employees in the midst of the academic year need not be considered. It would be open for the petitioner-Union to approach the concerned authority for implementing the policy of transfers in accordance with the directives of the State Government issued in that behalf. The representation tendered on 06.06.2016, as such, cannot be directed to be considered in the midst of the academic year.
2 Keeping an option open to the petitioner-Union to approach the concerned authority at an appropriate time, writ petition stands disposed of.
K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
Zilla Parishad Madhyamik Shikshak Sangh, Zilla Shakha, Nanded
State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
