Coram disposed of Writ Petition No. 9794 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner had an alternative remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. All contentions were kept open.
Petition disposed of with liberty to avail alternate remedy; all contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
946.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
946 WRIT PETITION NO. 9794 OF 2016
ANIL PANDURANG MHASKE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Patil Kuldeep S
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. B. A. Shinde
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
DATE:
23rd September, 2016
ORDER:
1. Learned AGP raises preliminary objection that
the petitioner has remedy before the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal. In view of that, though Mr.
Patil, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought
to canvass submissions on merits, we are not inclined
to consider the same.
2. Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to
the petitioner to avail alternate remedy. All
contentions are kept open.
(K. L. WADANE, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. )
JPC
1/1
Anil Pandurang Mhaske and Others
The State of Maharashtra and Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court