This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 9494.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9494 OF 2013
Santosh Magasvargiya Grahak Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Pravin S. Dighe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. S. S. Raut, A.G.P. for Respondents/State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 16TH JUNE, 2016.
PER COURT :
. It is submitted that, revision has already been decided. As such, prayers made in the petition do not survive. The writ petition as such is disposed of.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/June 16
Santosh Magasvargiya Grahak Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
