Dismissed

Ashwani Narayan Kolpuse v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC8 Sept 2016WP/9371/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged rejection of tribe validation due to reversed order of tribe name (Mahadev Koli vs. Koli Mahadev). Single Bench dismissed petition by issuing detailed procedural directions to respondents for verification and issuance of certificates within specific timelines.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to Scrutiny Committee and Sub-Divisional Officer to verify certificates and issue tribe and validity certificates within specified time limits.

Ashwani Narayan Kolpuse Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp9371.16.doc

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 9371 OF 2016

¶5

Smt. Ashwani Narayan Kolpuse age 39 years, occ. Service r/o At post Ambejogi Sugar Factory Tq. Ambejogai Dist. Beed. .. PETITIONER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Tribal Development Department Mantralaya Mumbai 32.

¶8

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad Through its Member Secretary

¶9

The Deputy Collector, (L.A.) B & C Collector office, Beed, Dist. Beed.

¶10

The District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad Beed, Dist. Beed. .. RESPONDENTS

¶11

Mr. P.P. Dama, advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.S. Dande, AGP for the State.

¶12

=====

¶13

CORAM : R.M. BORDE &

¶14

P. R. BORA, JJ. DATE : 8^th SEPTEMBER, 2016.

¶15

JUDGMENT : ( PER R. M. BORDE, J. )

¶16

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for respective parties.

¶17

The tribe validation claim of the petitioner has been turned down by the scrutiny committee on the ground that name of tribe mentioned on the

¶18

wp9371.16.doc

¶19

¶20

certificate is not in accordance with the entry recorded in the Presidential Order. The entry of the tribe recorded in the Presidential order is Koli Mahadev whereas the caste certificate issued to the petitioner records the entry as Mahadev Koli.

¶21

The Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.8.2014 in Writ Petition No. 4536/2014 and other connected writ petitions has considered this aspect and has disposed of the petitions by giving certain directions. In view of the order passed by the Division Bench in the aforesaid writ petitions, this writ petition stands disposed of with following directions :-

¶22

A) The petitioner may approach the concerned Scrutiny Committee for issuance of photostat copy of the tribe certificate produced by her for verification, within a period of four months from today. The Scrutiny Committee, on receipt of such application, issue attested/authenticated copy of the tribe certificate produced by petitioner for verification to the Committee.

¶23

B) The petitioner, on receipt of photostat copy of the tribe certificate, shall approach the concerned Sub Divisional Officer/competent authority with an application for issuance of tribe certificate within a period of six weeks, thereafter.

¶24

C) The concerned Sub Divisional Officer/Competent Authority, on receipt of the application by petitioner, together with attested/authenticated photostat copy of the tribe

¶25

wp9371.16.doc

¶26

¶27

certificate issued earlier, shall proceed to issue tribe certificate in prescribed proforma certifying that petitioner belongs to 'Koli Mahadev' (Scheduled Tribe). The Sub Divisional Officer / competent authority shall issue certificate within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the application.

¶28

D) On receipt of Tribe certificate, petitioner, shall approach the concerned Scrutiny Committee with a proposal in prescribed proforma requesting the Scrutiny Committee to verify the Tribe Certificate and consider her application for issuance of validity certificate. The petitioner shall approach the Scrutiny Committee within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of the tribe certificate from the competent authority.

¶29

E) On receipt of the proposal from petitioner, the Scrutiny Committee shall proceed to verify the tribe certificate and take appropriate decision after following procedure prescribed under law in respect of issuance of validity certificate, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the proposal/application.

¶30

F) The Scrutiny Committee shall accept the proposal directly and shall not refuse to accept the proposal on the ground that same has not been routed through proper channel, either employer or educational institution.

¶31

G) The employer shall not take any adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground of

¶32

wp9371.16.doc

¶33

¶34

her failure to produce validity certificate and further appropriate action can be taken only subject to result of verification claim, which would be lodged before the Scrutiny Committee, in accordance with the directions issued in this order.

¶35

H) The writ petition is disposed of. Rule is made absolute accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶36

( P. R. BORA ) JUDGE

¶37

( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE

¶38

dyb

Ashwani Narayan Kolpuse v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwani Narayan Kolpuse v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhakar Parashram Kale Vs the Union of India and Others

Chandrakant Manikrao Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Uqab Minority Educational and Welfare Soc. Faizpur Vs R.G.Gunjal and Others

Rakesh Darbar Barela Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sandip Jagannath Sonwane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shankar Jakoji Shirse and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others