The High Court disposed of a criminal writ petition alleging short-supply of rice, holding that vague allegations cannot warrant cognizance of the grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp857.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 857 OF 2016.
(ROOPAK EKNATH JAMBHULKAR ..VS..STATE OF MAH. THR. SECRETARY, MUMBAI & ANR.)
Shri Prem Ramteke, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms Mayuri Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent/ State.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 15, 2016.
On vague allegations of short-supply of rice no cognizance of the grievance, as presented, can be taken.
Hence, Criminal Writ Petition No. 857 of 2016 is
disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
RRaut..
ROOPAK EKNATH JAMBHULKAR
STATE OF MAH. THR. SECRETARY, MUMBAI & ANR.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
