The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 8568 of 2016 without expressing an opinion on the merits, directing the petitioner to approach the Panvel Municipal Corporation for the issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20wp8568.16.sxw
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8568 OF 2016
| Manohar Hasu Mhatre & anr. V/s. |
... | Petitioners |
|---|---|---|
| District Collector, Raigad & ors. | ... | Respondents |
Mr. N.H. Raval for the petitioners. Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND M.S. KARNIK, JJ .
28th November, 2016 .
P.C.
Learned Counsel submits that Panvel Municipal Corporation is
already constituted, therefore, the issue could be dealt with by the authorities of the Corporation. The petitioner may file appropriate representation.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Manohar Hasu Mhatre & anr.
District Collector, Raigad & ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
