Writ petition allowed with liberty to petitioner to make representation to the Collector of Nashik regarding grievances and supporting documents.
Petitioner allowed liberty to make representation before the Collector of Nashik with supporting documents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
94wpl10933.2016.sxw
1
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 10933 OF 2016
Meenabai Atmaram Dhage … Petitioner
Versus
The Returning Officer and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. K.P. Shah for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram V. Pai for respondent nos. 3 to 5. Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for the State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : JULY 11, 2016.
P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with a liberty to the petitioner to make representation before respondent no. 2 Collector of Nashik in regard to the grievances raised by the petitioner in this petition. Keeping in view the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file detailed representation with supporting documents before the Collector, Nashik. On receipt of the same, the Collector, Nashik shall look into the said representation and take appropriate action on it in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Meenabai Atmaram Dhage
The Returning Officer
Makarand Karnik
Shantanu Kemkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
