Allowed

Yash Suresh Jalalwad through His Father Suresh Rajaram Jalalwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC24 Aug 2016WP/8423/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order regarding a Writ Petition by an ST student facing delay in tribe certificate verification. The Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide on the verification within eight months and permitted the petitioner provisional admission to the next year's engineering course subject to final verification.

What did the court decide?

Directed Scrutiny Committee to decide on tribe certificate verification within eight months and permitted petitioner provisional admission to next year's engineering course.

Yash Suresh Jalalwad through His Father Suresh… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 WP-8423.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 8423 OF 2016

¶4

Yash Suresh Jalalwad under Guardian of his father Suresh Rajram Jalalwad ...PETITIONER

¶5

versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

¶7

...RESPONDENTS

¶8

Mr. Anil P. Piratwad, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A. B. Girase, GP For Respondent No. 1 & 2 Mr. A. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No. 3

¶9

CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

¶10

DATED : 24^th AUGUST, 2016.

¶11

Order :-

¶12

The petitioner claims to be belonging to “ Manerwarlu” , Scheduled Tribe (ST) and is in receipt of a tribe certificate issued by the competent authority, certifying accordingly. The petitioner has been admitted to engineering diploma course in respondent No. 3 – College. It is informed that the tribe certificate issued in favour of petitioner is referred for certification to respondent No. 2 - Scrutiny Committee and the tribe certificate verification proposal is pending with respondent No. 2 - Scrutiny Committee.

¶13

In the facts of the case, this petition can be disposed of by directing respondent No. 2 -Scrutiny Committee to take decision on the proposal in respect of tribe certificate verification pertaining to the petitioner, which is pending before it, as expeditiously as possible,

¶14

2 WP-8423.16

¶15

preferably within a period of eight months from today and it is accordingly directed.

¶16

In the meanwhile, Respondent No. 3 - College is directed to permit the petitioner to secure admission for next year engineering diploma course. Admission of the petitioner to the next year engineering diploma course in respondent No. 3 – College, shall be subject to decision of proceedings in respect of tribe certificate

¶17

verification claim pending with respondent No. 2 - Committee.

¶18

With aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

[K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]

¶22

MTK

Yash Suresh Jalalwad through His Father Suresh Rajaram Jalalwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yash Suresh Jalalwad through His Father Suresh Rajaram Jalalwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shakeel Ahmed Sk. Jamil Ahmed Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Saif Ul Islam Abdul Hameed and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sachidanand Ashok Shejwal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The Bodawad Sarwajanik Co. Operative Education Society through Its Chairman Motilal O Agrawal and or Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Amit Babasaheb Golhar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shiva Trusts Bharatratna Dr Apj Abdul Kalam College of Architecture Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others