Dismissed
Dr. Milind Suryakant Vyawahare Nagpur v. State of Mah and Another..
Bombay HCWP/83/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0806wp83.05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 83 OF 2005
(Dr. Milind Suryakant Vyawahare vs. State of Maharashtra and another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : JUNE 8, 2016
Heard Adv. Parchure for petitioner and Shri Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents.
Adv. Parchure submits that despite best efforts, petitioner could not be contacted and hence, he is not in a position to make a definite statement whether grievance of petitioner still survives or not.
Shri Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that petitioner wanted admission to Super Speciality Course as an in-service candidate before rendering five years of bond service. The same was denied to him in 2003-04. He contends that due to passage of time, petitioner may not be interested in staking claim to that admission now. He further submits that petitioner may have after
0806wp83.05
2/2
completing period of five years of bond service, taken admission and completed the course.
We do not wish to go into these complex issues at this stage. We dismiss the writ petition as infructuous. Rule is discharged. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Dr. Milind Suryakant Vyawahare
State of Maharashtra
another
B.P. Dharadhikari
Kum. Indira Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court