Petitioners challenged severe punishment imposed by the college principal for hostel disturbances. The High Court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that maintaining discipline was justified and refusing to interfere with the punishment's quantum.
The petitions were dismissed and Transfer Certificates were directed to be issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
1&2-WPG-8289.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8289 OF 2016
Akshay Uday Moglewar .... Petitioner Vs. I.L.S. Law College & Others .... Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.8291 OF 2016
Kumar Vikas Khadtale .... Petitioner Vs. I.L.S. Law College & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Atul Damble, Senior Counsel with Mr. Amol Wagh i/by Mr. Sagar Kasar for the Petitioners. Mr. Tejas P. Hartalkar i/by Mr. S.S. Kanetkar for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JULY 18, 2016
P.C:
Page 1 of 2
1&2-WPG-8289.2016.doc
suresh
orders.
(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the quantum of punishment imposed on students delinquent for disturbances in the college hostel.
Whether Transfer Certificates should be issued to the petitioners immediately.
AKSHAY UDAY MOGLEWAR
KUMAR VIKAS KHADTALE
I.L.S. LAW COLLEGE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
