Writ petition challenging an order of detention was treated as infructuous and disposed of on the state advising that the petition period order has been revoked.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 828-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 828 OF 2016
Smt. Sandra d/o Karuppanan … Petitioner Vs. Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhavi Mhatre, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 1, 2016
PC.
. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the Respondent-
State submits that the order of detention has been revoked by the State Government, by an order dated 23.3.2016. Copy of the said order produced by the learned APP is taken on record. Writ petition, therefore, has become infructuous, and is accordingly disposed of as such, and rule is discharged.
Sd/Sd/[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Smt. Sandra d/o Karuppanan
Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra
V. M. Kanade
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
