Dismissed

Shri. Balu Vitthal Waghmode v. Central Council of Indian Medicine, through President and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Mar 2016WP/8105/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Multiple writ petitions challenging the Central Council of Indian Medicine were dismissed as the petitioners had an alternate remedy by way of appeal before the Grievances Committee constituted under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed; no exercise of writ jurisdiction; direction to Grievances Committee to decide appeals expeditiously.

Shri. Balu Vitthal Waghmode Vs Central… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp-8105/14 & Group.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 8105 OF 2014 Balu Vitthal Waghmare. ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8106 OF 2014 Sanjivani Manik Jadhav ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8101 OF 2014 Sheetal Umesh Patil ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8107 OF 2014 Rajesh Pundlik Koli ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8109 OF 2014 Prashant Annaso Bhapkar ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8110 OF 2014 Yogesh Shrikant Mahadik ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents.

1 / 3

patilsr

wp-8105/14 & Group.

AND

WRIT PETITION NO. 8100 OF 2014

¶9

Ravindra Narayan Koli ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8103 OF 2014 Ravindra Subhash Shishte ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 5231 OF 2014 Annaso Dadaso Birmale ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11399 OF 2014 Bahubali Jinnappa Kempwade ..Petitioner. Versus Central Council of Indian Medicine and Others. ..Respondents.

¶10

..Respondents.

¶11

Mr. Vijay Killedear for the Petitioner. Mr. Mohd. Asadullah Bhaikh i/b Y. K. Singh for Respondent No.1.

¶12

Mr. U. V. Warunjikar for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. V. M. Sagare, AGP for the State.

¶13

Coram : Ranjit More & Dr.(Smt) S. S. Phansalkar-Joshi, JJ. Date : March 8, 2016 .

¶14

P. C. :

¶15

Having heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, we find that the Petitioners have an

2 / 3

patilsr

wp-8105/14 & Group.

alternate and efficacious remedy of appeal which will lie before the Grievances Committee constituted under section 53 of the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain these writ petitions and exercise our writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Resultantly, writ petitions are dismissed.

¶20

If any appeal as contemplated under section 53 of the said Act is filed, the Grievances Committee shall deal with the same and decide it as expeditiously as possible and preferably within the period of 6 months of its filing. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on the rival contentions and the pleas raised in the petitions and they are kept open to be canvassed before the Grievances Committee.

¶21

[Dr. (Smt.) S. S. Phansalkar-Joshi, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶22

3 / 3

¶23

patilsr

Shri. Balu Vitthal Waghmode v. Central Council of Indian Medicine, through President and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Balu Vitthal Waghmode v. Central Council of Indian Medicine, through President and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Sadhana Vijay Chaudhari Vs the President / Chairman, Childrens Aid Society and Ors.

Vandana Harishchandra Bhalerao Vs Sangopan Shikshan Sanstha and Ors.

Shri. Popat Bhimrao Jadhav Vs Rastriya Shikshan Sangh, through President/Chairman and Ors.

Dr. Shrirang Pandharinath Bathe Vs the Vice Chancellor, University of Pune and Ors.

Shri. Balu Vitthal Waghmode Vs Central Council of Indian Medicine, through President and Ors.

Shri. Hanmant Siddhram Ambi Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.