The court directed the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 15/12/2015 in accordance with law and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to respondent to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 15/12/2015 in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 798-16 (S.M.
25.2.16).doc-P-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.798 OF 2016
| Smt. Shalabai Balu Thorat. | ] | ... Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Mumbai M/West Ward, |
] ] |
|
| State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary. |
] ] |
.... Respondent |
Mr. Nitesh S. Nevshe for Petitioner.
CORAM :- M. S. SONAK, J. DATE :- FEBRUARY 17, 2016
P. C. :-
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
This order is corrected as per speaking to the minutes order dated 25.2.2016 URS
1 of 1
Smt. Shalabai Balu Thorat
Assistant Municipal Commissioner, Mumbai M/West Ward
State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
