Dismissed

Ajit Bapu Satam v. Union of India through Its Secretary and Anr.

Bombay HC3 Oct 2016WP/7948/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions challenging service tax proceedings were dismissed as they were entirely covered by a prior Division Bench judgment in Nimbus Communications Limited. The court granted six weeks to comply with statutory conditions for filing an appeal.

What did the court decide?

Six weeks granted to comply with statutory conditions for appealing; payment and proof required for Tribunal to entertain appeal.

Ajit Bapu Satam v. Union of India through Its Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajit Bapu Satam v. Union of India through Its Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Chander Sharma Vs Bank of India and 7 Ors.

Jitendra Sadanand Mahulkar and 7 Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 9 Ors.

The Commissioner of Income Tax , I Pune Vs Apoorva Properties and Estates Pvt. Ltd.

Talreja Textile Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Deepak Sharad Jare Vs Union of India and Anr.

M/S. Samartha Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. through Shri. Pratapsinha R. Chavhan Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Finance and Ors.