The High Court at Nagpur rejected the writ petition, holding that the case involved disputed questions of fact which could not be examined under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp786.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.786 OF 2016 Ashok S/o Gangaramji Puttewar
..vs..
The Collector, Collector Office, LIC Square, Yavatmal and ors
....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Shri P.S. Wathore, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Amit Balpande, AGP for R-1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 18, 2016. Heard.
Since the petition involves various disputed questions of facts which cannot be looked into in extraordinary jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the writ petition is rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
!! BRW !!
.....2/-
wp786.16
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that this Order/Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.
Uploaded by : Bhushan R.Wankhede. Uploaded on : - 18/08/2016 (Personal Assistant)
...../-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can intervene in a matter involving disputed questions of fact under its extraordinary jurisdiction.
Ashok S/o Gangaramji Puttewar
The Collector
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
