The single-judge bench dismissed a writ petition as the Petitioners' challenge to the Sub-Divisional Officer's order became infructuous because the antecedent Regular Civil Suit determining land rights had already been disposed of by this Court.
Writ petition dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DSS
910-wp-7803-15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7803 OF 2015
Maruti T. Kadam and ors. ..Petitioners vs. Vishnu S. Bondre and anr. .. Respondents
Mr. A.P. Kulkarni for the Petitioners. Ms Priyanka Joshi i/b Mr. Rahul S. Kate for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 18 OCTOBER 2016.
P.C. :-
1] Ms Priyanka Joshi, learned counsel for respondent No.1, submits that the challenge in this petition is to the order dated 25 August 2011 made by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati, SubDivision, Baramati, dismissing the petitioners' revision application against the Tahsildar's order dated 9 September 2010. She submits that the impugned order makes it clear that the Tahsildar's order dated 9 September 2010 was subject to final decision in Regular Civil Suit No. 183 of 2008. She further submits that in pursuance of the order dated 26 April 2011 made by this Court in Writ Petition No. 319 of 2010, Regular Civil Suit No. 183 of 2008 and the connected Regular Civil Suit No. 273 of 2010 have already been disposed of. Therefore, she submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
1/2
DSS
910-wp-7803-15
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
dinesh
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the sub-divisional officer's order has become infructuous since the underlying civil suit determining land rights has already been disposed of.
Maruti T. Kadam and ors.
Vishnu S. Bondre and anr.
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
