High Court dismissed Writ Petition challenging Tribunal order, holding no inclination to entertain petition in extraordinary jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP774-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No.774/2016 (Vishal s/o Laxman Janiyani and another .vs. State Bank of Hyderabad, Nagpur and another.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. R.S. Kalkar, Advocate for Petitioners.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : February 09, 2016.
The learned Tribunal has given elaborate and sound reasons while dismissing the appeal as well as the application for waiver of deposit.
In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the petition in the extra ordinary jurisdiction. Writ petition is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Vishal s/o Laxman Janiyani and another
State Bank of Hyderabad, Nagpur and another
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
