Petitioners sought writ relief regarding appointment grievances. Court held that authorities approved appointments, redressing grievances, and disposed of petitions.
Petitions disposed of on merits stating grievances redressed by appointment approval.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 7642 & 7628.13.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITIOIN NO.7628 OF 2013
Ramdas S/o Murlidhar Shenkar Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7642 OF 2013
Raju S/o Rajiv Gavit Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr. Ajay G. Talhar advocate for the petitioners Mr.S.K. Kadam, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1 to 4. Mr. A.V. Hon advocate for respondent Nos. 5 & 6
CORAM: R.M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ
Date: March 17, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions states that, the respondent authorities have accorded approval to the appointments of the petitioners and as such, the grievances raised by the petitioners in these petitions stand redressed.
( P.R. BORA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Ramdas S/o Murlidhar Shenkar
Raju S/o Rajiv Gavit
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
