Petition under Article 227 challenging District Judge's order was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal from the order. Court clarified it did not examine merits.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file appeal from the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 WP/7563/2015
Tapadia RR/B.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7563 OF 2015
..Petitioners
Vs
.. Respondents
Mr. Mohan N. Dhamal, Advocate for the Petitioners.
CORAM : R.G.KETKAR,J. DATE : 09/03/2016
PC :
2 / 2 WP/7563/2015
be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is made clear that I
have not examined merits of the case.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.)
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Shri VyankateshDev (Devsthan) through Prashant Shrirang Jagtap and Anr.
Sou. Praveena Vikran Ghotge and Ors.
R.G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
