The Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, accepted the Investigating Officer's statement regarding pending charge-sheet and dismissed the Criminal Writ Petition as disposed with no further ado.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.734 OF 2016
Dr.Eknath Khanderao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.M.S.Deshmukh, advocate holding for Mr.B.S.Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.Y.Mahajaj, A.P.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 26.10.2016.
PER COURT :
Officer, who is present in the Court states that within a month, charge-sheet would be filed against 17 persons who were arrested and as far as 5 persons who are not arrested, the steps are being taken against them and supplementary charge-sheet would be filed against them. The said statement is accepted.
2
(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.26.10.2016. asp/office/Criwp734.16
Dr. Eknath Khanderao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
K.L.WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
