Writ petition disposed of on undertaking that representations would be decided by Competent Authority on or before 4th July 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-WP-7266-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.7266 OF 2016
MS.POOJA UDHHAV IPPAR
)...PETITIONER
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. )...RESPONDENTS
Shri Pradeep Thorat a/w. Shri Vinod Chate i/by. Chate & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri A.B.Vegyani, Govt. Pleader, a/w.Ms.Gauri Rao, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 29th JUNE 2016.
P.C. :
1 This matter was argued yesterday i.e. on 28th June
2016 and was placed for passing final orders only because
Mr.Vagyani appearing for respondents was awaiting certain instructions.
avk 1/2
903-WP-7266-2016.doc
2 Now, on instructions, Mr.Vegyani states that two representations of the petitioner, copies of which are Annexures K and L to the petition at pages 27 and 29, would be decided by the Competent Authority on or before 4th July 2016.
3 We accept this statement of Mr.Vagyani made on instructions, as undertaking to this court and dispose of this writ petition.
(DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
avk 2/2
MS. POOJA UDHHAV IPPAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SC DHARMADHIKARI
DR SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
