Writ petition was filed regarding de-notification of property. Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition upon considering a departmental notification. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7112.13wp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ WRIT PETITION NO. 7112 OF 2013
BHANUDAS GOPINATH KAKADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Sonwane Vilas D. AGP for Respondents/State: Mr.S.S. Dande. Advocate for Respondents : Mr.Deve S.S. for R-3, Mr.Bajaj Anil S. for R/9.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ. Dated: MARCH 09, 2016
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. He has tendered across the Bar copy of the notification issued by ;the Department of Industry, Energy and Labour, Government of Maharashtra, which is taken on record and marked "X" for identification purpose.
2 Relying upon the said notification, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, the
7112.13wp
2
property of the petitioner and other agriculturists has been de-notified.
3 In that view of the matter, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
Bhanudas Gopinath Kakade
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
V.L. Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
