Dismissed
Arjun Ramchandra Pol v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/703/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7b. cri wp 703-14.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 703 OF 2014
Arjun Ramchandra Pol
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
| Appearances |
|---|
| Mr. Yashpal Thakur | Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Mr. A.S. Shitole | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATE : APRIL 28, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
arrested in C.R. No. 13/2006 of Shirala Police Station, Sangli.
The said case was numbered as Sessions Case No. 36 of 2006. In the said case, by judgment and order dated
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 3
7b. cri wp 703-14.doc
31.1.2008 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sangli, the petitioner was convicted under Section 307 of IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred Criminal Appeal No. 272 of 2008 before this Court. This Court, by Judgment & Order dated 10.10.2013, partly allowed the appeal. The conviction under Section 307 was maintained, however, the sentence of life imprisonment was reduced to the period undergone by the petitioner i.e 7 years and 4 months. When the appeal was disposed of by this Court, it was not brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner was not through out in jail but in fact, he was on bail pending the trial from 27.6.2006 till 31.1.2008. The prayer of the petitioner in the present petition is that the period of imprisonment imposed by this Court i.e of 7 years and 4 Months be reduced to the period undergone by the petitioner.
judgment and order dated 10.10.2013 passed by this Court
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 3
7b. cri wp 703-14.doc
in Criminal Appeal No. 272 of 2008, however, the learned APP, on instructions, states that the petitioner has completed
the sentence of imprisonment and was released from prison.
In this view of the matter, this petition is infructuous, hence,
rule is discharged.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
3 of 3
jfoanz vkacsjdj
Arjun Ramchandra Pol
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court